And then it expects people to believe it has a formal education....


BWAHAHAHAHA!!! BWAHAHAHA!!

Wow, have to keep moving around, what?

Then please explain your self.


Would you also care to explain when you cut n paste an article, why you do not cut out the whole article?
Are you a Mislead?


You are a liar, Misanthrope2.
I see it and everyone here sees it.
If this, for some strange reason, is not actually true, I would say that by your postings, they rate as the most ignorant seen and our political system truly is fucked up if you were in it.
BTW:
You have divulged such information as where your plaques are held. Where you live.
and other personal information.
I find this odd coming from an attorney in California.(not to mention the other experiences you say you have)

Very odd indeed!

Misconstrue:

While viewing the link you provided I found this juicy little tid bit:

Could you please explain the use of your word sciencing in the context you used it in below?


Look at how this unsuspecting Huffpo user gets "jumped" by Misconstrue2.
Not only does it question this other persons credibilities but watch how ignorant it is to the English language as well.

This guy wasnt even talking to you. Then you attacked his credentials. The whole time, used wording and phrasing that makes no sense and is not even correct english!
Dont you feel stupid?
You chased this guy away.
He hasnt been back on since...I checked.

He did not even respond to you.

This, I will submit, is the true educated response.

Behold the ignorance of its vicious retorts when threatened by a colleagues knowledge on its home turf!!

dsbsh said:

"As a political scientist who knows how to follow a hyperlink (http://www.apsanet.org/section_279.cfm), I can report that your "correction" regarding the Kammerer prize is trivial to the point of being embarrassing:

What's more, you're responding to a blog, not a treatise. That he didn't quote Madison is beside the point. As a political scientist, I'm sure you're aware that the literature on constitutional meaning and the framers' intent is extensive. If you disagree with Stone (and/or Bailyn), explain your disagreement; pointing your finger and saying "liberal" demeans the profession."


.............................................


Misconstrue2's unsolicited ignorant retort:

And I quote:

"As a fellow political scientist, I am wondering what you did with your political sciencing degree.

Are you perhaps a number cruncher?

A high school teacher?"



Now,
would you please explain the use of "political sciencing degree?"

"Sciencing" is not even a word!

Dont you feel stupid questioning someone else, when you, yourself, butcher the English language the way you do?
Did you not find it odd he did not even respond to you?
How can you be so nasty to someone when they are what they say and you obviously are NOT?

WTF?

Obviously, "conservative activism" does not describe Ron Paul's interpretation of the Constitution, because he does not "protect the interests of corporations, the wealthy, the privileged, the majority, and the powerful." If he did, major corporations would be standing in line to donate to his campaign the way they do for Hillary Clinton.

Ron Paul's policies would make this a third world country.

Misconstrue2:



I have allowed you to misspell Israel for about two weeks now. I first noticed this misspelling on a Ron Paul post that you were yet again spamming and throwing massive amounts of links to wikipedia, something which most lazy, uneducated, paid hacks do.
I have allowed you to write this word "ISREAL" appx 30 times....Each time you were never called out nor did you notice your spelling mistake. Which means this was not just an accidental mistake...You have NEVER spelled this word right!

MY QUESTION to you:

With someone as (ALLEGEDLY) experienced and educated in "political sciencing" knowledge, how is it you misspell one of the most commonly used words in your own area of education, "ISRAEL"?
30 TIMES?

I submit you are a liar, spammer, and likes to mislead and agitate. You are rude and often offensive to many. You teach others these same manners. I have called you out and so have many others.
Your drab personality and useless cut n paste rants deserve little if no attention.
I say little, because sometimes your posts should be used for learning (what not to do) experiences.

HERES another for those of you who believe this trolls profile.

Mislead2 said to another unsuspecting Huffpo user:

"How long have you had your political sciencing degree?

Are you sure its not a high school degree?"

............

"Political sciencing degree" as used above, was yet again, another example of the disaster Misconstrue2 makes out of the English language.
There is NO WORD "sciencing" and no one with these alleged credentials it says it has, would use this word.
Especially to describe a degree it ACTUALLY wants us to believe it holds!
The current Democrats have taught it well.

Hey troll, have the Jaws of Life removed your nose from Feinsteins ASS yet?

bye.

So what do you think about Ron Paul's racist statements made in 1992 that he took almost ten years to apologize?

Here they are:

Ron Paul, writing in his independent political newsletter in 1992:

"Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty and the end of welfare and affirmative action,"Paul wrote.

Paul continued that politically sensible blacks are outnumbered "as decent people." Citing reports that 85 percent of all black men in the District of Columbia are arrested, Paul wrote:

"Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the `criminal justice system,' I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal," Paul said.

Paul also wrote that although "we are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers."
.....

He added, "We don't think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. That's true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such."

Paul also asserted that "complex embezzling" is conducted exclusively by non-blacks.

"What else do we need to know about the political establishment than that it refuses to discuss the crimes that terrify Americans on grounds that doing so is racist? Why isn't that true of complex embezzling, which is 100 percent white and Asian?" he wrote.
.....

Relaying a rumor that Clinton was a longtime cocaine user, Paul wrote in 1994 that the speculation "would explain certain mysteries" about the president's scratchy voice and insomnia.

"None of this is conclusive, of course, but it sure is interesting," he said.

http://thesaloon.net/blog/_archives/2007/5/20/2963953.html